Head to head
Gerolsteiner vs San Pellegrino
Published analyses side by side, then an honest verdict.
| Gerolsteiner | San Pellegrino | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Sparkling | Sparkling |
| TDS (mg/L) | 2500 | 853 |
| Calcium | 347 | 175 |
| Magnesium | 104 | 47 |
| Sodium | 117 | 30 |
| Bicarbonate | 1808 | 235 |
| Sulfate | 37 | 430 |
| Chloride | 40 | 53 |
| Silica | 40.2 | not published |
| Nitrate | 5.1 | 2.8 |
Germany’s mineral heavyweight against Italy’s table star. Gerolsteiner is nearly three times as dense (TDS 2500 vs 853) with a huge bicarbonate load (1808 mg/L) that keeps it improbably round for its weight — plus 104 mg/L magnesium, over the taste threshold, so a genuine tonic edge sneaks in. San Pellegrino is drier, not rounder: its mineral character comes from sulfate, and its bead is finer.
Pick Gerolsteiner if you want maximum mineral payload that still drinks smooth — and you like that faint bitter grip. Pick San Pellegrino for a lighter, drier, more food-flexible glass.
Full profiles: Gerolsteiner · San Pellegrino. All values mg/L from the analyses cited on each water’s page.