Head to head
Acqua Panna vs San Pellegrino
Published analyses side by side, then an honest verdict.
| Acqua Panna | San Pellegrino | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Still | Sparkling |
| TDS (mg/L) | 188 | 853 |
| Calcium | 32 | 175 |
| Magnesium | 6.5 | 47 |
| Sodium | 6.6 | 30 |
| Bicarbonate | 106 | 235 |
| Sulfate | 22 | 430 |
| Chloride | 7.8 | 53 |
| Silica | 7 | not published |
| Nitrate | 2.4 | 2.8 |
The two bottles that arrive together at every white tablecloth in the world, less rivals than a matched pair. Acqua Panna is the still half, Tuscan and deliberately quiet at TDS 188, low in everything, with a soft velvety texture built to get out of the way of wine. San Pellegrino is the sparkling half and four and a half times as mineral (TDS 853), a third of that load sulfate at 430 mg/L, which is where the dry saline finish comes from, under a famously fine bead.
Pick Acqua Panna when the water should stay invisible beside the glass next to it, whites, delicate food, anything you would rather taste than interrupt. Pick San Pellegrino when the water has a job, cutting fat and resetting the palate between courses. Ordering both is not indecision, it is how the pairing was designed.
Full profiles: Acqua Panna · San Pellegrino. All values mg/L from the analyses cited on each water’s page.
You now know more about mineral water than anyone at your table. You still don’t know which one is yours. That takes seven swipes and about a minute.
Or just find your water